A study on the comparison of morpho-anatomical structure and DNA extract of sun and shade leaves of jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) was done. Morphological structure of exposed the Corchorus capsularis are taller, leaves are lighter, thicker, bigger and broader than shaded. Anatomical form of exposed jute have many stomata on the leaf, two layered palisade and compact spongy layer of leaf lamina, compact cells of the mesophyll of midrib, compact parenchyma cells of the cortex of the stem, and larger vacuole in the pith of the stem. While shaded jute has less stomata on the leaf, one layered palisade and loosely arranged cells in the spongy layer of leaf lamina, loosely arranged cells of the mesophyll of midrib, loosely arranged parenchyma cells of the cortex of the stem, and small vacuole in the pith of the stem. In terms of DNA extract, exposed leaves of jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) has more DNA extract than that of the shaded leaves. Thus, morpho-anatomical structure and DNA extract of exposed and shaded jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) differ.
Published in |
American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 3, Issue 6-1)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Agro-Ecosystems |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaf.s.2015030601.11 |
Page(s) | 1-5 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Jute, DNA Extract, Stomata, Mesophyll, Parenchyma, Palisade, Morpho-Anatomical Structure
[1] | Ciurczak, E. 2009. How to Extract DNA from an Onion. How to Extract DNA From an Onion|eHow.comhttp://www.ehow.com/ how_5031951_extract-dna-onion.html#ixzz0z17ifOuW |
[2] | Del Río, J. C. et al., 2009. Chemical Composition of Lipophilic Extractives from Jute (Corchorus capsularis) Fibers Used for Manufacturing of High-Quality Paper Pulps. Industrial Crops and Products. Volume 30, Issue 2. p. 241-249. |
[3] | Holley, D. 2009. Light and Temperature Influence Plant Growth: The Role of Light Intensity and Temperature in Plant Development. http://www.suite101.com/content/light-and-temperature-influence-plant-growth-a131226#ixzz11XWzxSuv |
[4] | Lambers, H. et al. 1998.Plant to Physiological Ecology. http:// books.google.com.ph/books?id=PXBq6jsT5SYC&pg=PA148&lpg=PA148&dq=lambers+1998&source=bl&ots=zpLMh9HpjB&sig=yE53q9_se6AN3ENjvshM6lUZ-b4&hl=tl&ei=3XysTKH4DYPJcaKq-cwE&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBoQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=sun%20and%20shade%20leaf&f=false. p. 29 – 35. |
[5] | Lichtenthaler, et al., 1983.Photosynthetic Activity, Chloroplast Ultrastructure, and Leaf. Characteristics of High-Light and Low-Light Plants and of Sun and Shade Leaves. Photosynthesis Research. Volume 2, Number 2, 115-141. |
[6] | Paiva, E. A. S., et al. 2003. The Influence of Light Intensity on Anatomical Structure and Pigment Contents of Tradescantia Pallida(Rose) Hunt. Cv. Purpurea Boom (Commelinaceae) Leaves. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology.Vol.46, n. 4: pp. 617-624. |
[7] | Philippine Herbal Medicine. 2010. Saluyot. www.philippineherbalmedicine. org/doh_herbs.htm |
[8] | SEP staff. 2010. Extract Your Own DNA From Cheek Cells. http://seplessons.ucsf.edu/files/See%20your%20DNA.pdf |
[9] | VanCleave, J. 2010. Discovery Investigation: DNA Extraction. DNA Extraction Research Science Project Ideas for Kids.http://scienceprojectideasforkids.com. |
[10] | Morais, H., M.E. Medri, C.J. Manur, P.H. Caramoni, A. Ma. De Arruda Ribeiro and J.C. Gomes. 2004. Modification of leaf anatomy of Coffea Arabica caused by shade of pegionpea (Cajanus cajan). Brazilian Archives of biology and technology. Vol. 47, no. 6: pp. 863-871. |
APA Style
Farida D. Silverio. (2015). Morpho-Anatomical Structure and DNA Extract of Sun and Shade Leaves of Jute (Corchorus capsularis L.). American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 3(6-1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.s.2015030601.11
ACS Style
Farida D. Silverio. Morpho-Anatomical Structure and DNA Extract of Sun and Shade Leaves of Jute (Corchorus capsularis L.). Am. J. Agric. For. 2015, 3(6-1), 1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.s.2015030601.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.s.2015030601.11, author = {Farida D. Silverio}, title = {Morpho-Anatomical Structure and DNA Extract of Sun and Shade Leaves of Jute (Corchorus capsularis L.)}, journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry}, volume = {3}, number = {6-1}, pages = {1-5}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.s.2015030601.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.s.2015030601.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.s.2015030601.11}, abstract = {A study on the comparison of morpho-anatomical structure and DNA extract of sun and shade leaves of jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) was done. Morphological structure of exposed the Corchorus capsularis are taller, leaves are lighter, thicker, bigger and broader than shaded. Anatomical form of exposed jute have many stomata on the leaf, two layered palisade and compact spongy layer of leaf lamina, compact cells of the mesophyll of midrib, compact parenchyma cells of the cortex of the stem, and larger vacuole in the pith of the stem. While shaded jute has less stomata on the leaf, one layered palisade and loosely arranged cells in the spongy layer of leaf lamina, loosely arranged cells of the mesophyll of midrib, loosely arranged parenchyma cells of the cortex of the stem, and small vacuole in the pith of the stem. In terms of DNA extract, exposed leaves of jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) has more DNA extract than that of the shaded leaves. Thus, morpho-anatomical structure and DNA extract of exposed and shaded jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) differ.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Morpho-Anatomical Structure and DNA Extract of Sun and Shade Leaves of Jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) AU - Farida D. Silverio Y1 - 2015/11/10 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.s.2015030601.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaf.s.2015030601.11 T2 - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JO - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry SP - 1 EP - 5 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.s.2015030601.11 AB - A study on the comparison of morpho-anatomical structure and DNA extract of sun and shade leaves of jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) was done. Morphological structure of exposed the Corchorus capsularis are taller, leaves are lighter, thicker, bigger and broader than shaded. Anatomical form of exposed jute have many stomata on the leaf, two layered palisade and compact spongy layer of leaf lamina, compact cells of the mesophyll of midrib, compact parenchyma cells of the cortex of the stem, and larger vacuole in the pith of the stem. While shaded jute has less stomata on the leaf, one layered palisade and loosely arranged cells in the spongy layer of leaf lamina, loosely arranged cells of the mesophyll of midrib, loosely arranged parenchyma cells of the cortex of the stem, and small vacuole in the pith of the stem. In terms of DNA extract, exposed leaves of jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) has more DNA extract than that of the shaded leaves. Thus, morpho-anatomical structure and DNA extract of exposed and shaded jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) differ. VL - 3 IS - 6-1 ER -