Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is the world’s second most important grain legumes after common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) among food legumes grown for production worldwide. Ethiopia is considered as secondary center of genetic diversity for chickpea. Field experiment was conducted at two districts with the objectives to demonstrate different insecticide for the control of pod borer on chickpea and to give awareness on the use and effectiveness of the insecticide against pod borer on chick pea. The experiment was conducted using one chickpea variety; Habru (more preferred) and two insecticide Diazenon (1.2l/ha) and Karate (400ml/ha). The result revealed that both insecticides were effective against pod borer even if they have slight difference on percent larval reductions at both districts. The pod borer damage reduction by different treatments ranged from 71.87% to 90.63% and 58.33% to 66.66% compared to that in control at Ginir and Goro, respectively. Diazenon resulted maximum seed yield 2610kg/ha and 2200kg/ha at Ginir and Goro, respectively. The plot sprayed with Diazenon gave the maximum net return birr 75,348/ha and 61,120/ha at Ginir and Goro, respectively. It is recommended that these insecticides are suggested to the growers for the management of pod borer population below economic threshold level under field conditions.
Published in | American Journal of Plant Biology (Volume 3, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajpb.20180303.11 |
Page(s) | 29-32 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Chickpea, Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera, Insecticide, Net Return
[1] | Ahmed K, Awan MS, 2013. Integerated management of insect pests of chickpea Cicer arietinum (L.) Walp in South Asian Countries: Present status and future strategies-a review. Pak. J. Zool., 45:1125-1145. |
[2] | Gaur, M. P., Aravind, K. J., and Rajeev, K. V. 2012. A review of impact of Genomic technologies on chickpea breeding strategies. Agronomy, 2:200-203. |
[3] | Geletu Bejega and Anbessa, Y. 1994. Breeding chickpea for resistance to drought. International symposium on pulse research, April 2-6. New Delhi, India, pp. 145-146. |
[4] | Jagdish, K., Sethi, S. C., Jonansen, C. T., Kelley, M. R. and Rheene, H. A. 1995. Earliness-acure for most illness of chickpea. P20-23. In: Intentional Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter, ICRISAT, Andhra Pradesh, India. |
[5] | Javed H, Iqbal J, Khan TM, 2013. Studies on population dynamics of insect pest of safflower, Carthamus tinctorius L. Pak. J. Zool., 45:213-217. |
[6] | Kanouni, H., Taleei, A. and Okhovat, M. 2011. Aschchyta blight (Ascochyta rabiei(Pass.)Lab.) of Chickpea (CicerarietinumL.):Breeding strategies for resistance. International Journal of plant Breeding and Genetics 5:1-22. |
[7] | Khan S M, Inayatullah MY, Khan MA, 2009. Varietal screening of chickpea and the efficacy of different insecticides against chickpea pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (hb). Gomal Univ. J. Res., 25: 20-24. |
[8] | Melese, D. 2005. Morphological and RAPD marker variation analysis in some drought tolerant and susceptible chickpea (CicerarietinumL.) genotypes of Ethiopia. M.Sc Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia Pp2-5. |
[9] | Patankar AG, Giri AP, Harsulkar AM, Sainari MN, Deshpade VV, Ranjekar PK, Gupta VS, 2001. Complexity in specificities and expression of Helicoverpa armigera gut proteinases explains polyphagous nature of insect pest. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol., 31: 453-464. |
[10] | Sreekanth M, Lakshmi MSM, Rao YK, 2014. Bio-Efficacy and economics of certain new insecticides against gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). Int. J. Plant Anim. Environ. Sci., 4: 11-15. |
[11] | Suhail A, Iqbal J, Arshad M, Gogi MD, Arif MJ, Shafait T, 2013. Comparative efficacy of insecticides as seed treatment against wheat aphid and its coccinellid predator. Pak. Entomol., 35: 17-22. |
[12] | Tilaye, A., Gelatu, B., and Berhe, A., 1994. Role of cool season food legumes and their production constraints in Ethiopia agriculture. Pp. 3-18. In: Cool Season Food Legumes of 67 Ethiopia |
[13] | Yadeta, A. and Geletu, B. 2002. Evaluation of Ethiopian chickpea landraces for tolerance to drought. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 49:557-564. |
APA Style
Dagne Kora, Ermias Teshome, Amare Biftu. (2018). On Farm Demonstration and Evaluation of Synthetic Insecticides for the Control of Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner) on Chickpea in Bale Zone. American Journal of Plant Biology, 3(3), 29-32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20180303.11
ACS Style
Dagne Kora; Ermias Teshome; Amare Biftu. On Farm Demonstration and Evaluation of Synthetic Insecticides for the Control of Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner) on Chickpea in Bale Zone. Am. J. Plant Biol. 2018, 3(3), 29-32. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20180303.11
AMA Style
Dagne Kora, Ermias Teshome, Amare Biftu. On Farm Demonstration and Evaluation of Synthetic Insecticides for the Control of Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner) on Chickpea in Bale Zone. Am J Plant Biol. 2018;3(3):29-32. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20180303.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajpb.20180303.11, author = {Dagne Kora and Ermias Teshome and Amare Biftu}, title = {On Farm Demonstration and Evaluation of Synthetic Insecticides for the Control of Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner) on Chickpea in Bale Zone}, journal = {American Journal of Plant Biology}, volume = {3}, number = {3}, pages = {29-32}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajpb.20180303.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20180303.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpb.20180303.11}, abstract = {Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is the world’s second most important grain legumes after common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) among food legumes grown for production worldwide. Ethiopia is considered as secondary center of genetic diversity for chickpea. Field experiment was conducted at two districts with the objectives to demonstrate different insecticide for the control of pod borer on chickpea and to give awareness on the use and effectiveness of the insecticide against pod borer on chick pea. The experiment was conducted using one chickpea variety; Habru (more preferred) and two insecticide Diazenon (1.2l/ha) and Karate (400ml/ha). The result revealed that both insecticides were effective against pod borer even if they have slight difference on percent larval reductions at both districts. The pod borer damage reduction by different treatments ranged from 71.87% to 90.63% and 58.33% to 66.66% compared to that in control at Ginir and Goro, respectively. Diazenon resulted maximum seed yield 2610kg/ha and 2200kg/ha at Ginir and Goro, respectively. The plot sprayed with Diazenon gave the maximum net return birr 75,348/ha and 61,120/ha at Ginir and Goro, respectively. It is recommended that these insecticides are suggested to the growers for the management of pod borer population below economic threshold level under field conditions.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - On Farm Demonstration and Evaluation of Synthetic Insecticides for the Control of Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner) on Chickpea in Bale Zone AU - Dagne Kora AU - Ermias Teshome AU - Amare Biftu Y1 - 2018/12/03 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20180303.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajpb.20180303.11 T2 - American Journal of Plant Biology JF - American Journal of Plant Biology JO - American Journal of Plant Biology SP - 29 EP - 32 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-8337 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20180303.11 AB - Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is the world’s second most important grain legumes after common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) among food legumes grown for production worldwide. Ethiopia is considered as secondary center of genetic diversity for chickpea. Field experiment was conducted at two districts with the objectives to demonstrate different insecticide for the control of pod borer on chickpea and to give awareness on the use and effectiveness of the insecticide against pod borer on chick pea. The experiment was conducted using one chickpea variety; Habru (more preferred) and two insecticide Diazenon (1.2l/ha) and Karate (400ml/ha). The result revealed that both insecticides were effective against pod borer even if they have slight difference on percent larval reductions at both districts. The pod borer damage reduction by different treatments ranged from 71.87% to 90.63% and 58.33% to 66.66% compared to that in control at Ginir and Goro, respectively. Diazenon resulted maximum seed yield 2610kg/ha and 2200kg/ha at Ginir and Goro, respectively. The plot sprayed with Diazenon gave the maximum net return birr 75,348/ha and 61,120/ha at Ginir and Goro, respectively. It is recommended that these insecticides are suggested to the growers for the management of pod borer population below economic threshold level under field conditions. VL - 3 IS - 3 ER -