| Peer-Reviewed

On the Origin and Invariance of the Genetic Assignments as Elementary Semiotic Controls: A Basic Hypothesis

Received: 23 July 2014     Accepted: 3 August 2014     Published: 10 August 2014
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In this paper we hope to place the two basic facts of life, constant active self – maintenance and self – reproduction, into a fresh light. The basic idea is considering the genetic assignments as a „biological invariant of motion”, the latter forming a hierarchically produced, „self - constructing”, regressive time inversion symmetry restoration, a closed semantic real – time upbuilding loop. It is, actually, the predetermined future of the biological system. It is this, in fact, what gives birth to the above strange fact of determined self – maintenance and, as its derived consequence, „self” – reproduction, as the symmery attained. It is carried out in a mediated, „weak” self – reference loop, as a natural prerequisite for the invariance of the genetic code as a „biological invariant of motion”. Being an involved and dubious case, as it is usual, we mainly concentrate on its origin. We suppose a special type of quantum measurement as the original assignation mechanism, with a usual concomitant time inversion symmetry breaking. Symmetry restoring, in fact, is a semiotic control process of the genetic code, the process tentatively conceived to be the living (biological) state of matter.

Published in European Journal of Biophysics (Volume 2, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ejb.20140203.12
Page(s) 17-28
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

The Biological Invariant of Motion, Struggle for Life, Causal Break in Quantum Dynamic, Group Theory, Time Inversion Symmetry Restoring, the Nonlinearity of the Genetic Code

References
[1] Balázs A (2013) The biological “invariant of motion” vs. “struggle for life”? On the possible quantum mechanical origin and evolution of semiotic controls in biology. Information 4, 367 – 397.
[2] Neumann, J (1955) Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton), Chapters V. – VI.
[3] Wigner, E P (1961) Remarks on the mind-body question. The Scientist Speculates. ed. Good I.J., (Heinemann, London), pp. 284–302.
[4] Belinfante FJ (1975) Measurement and Time Reversal in Objective Quantum Theory. (Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford)
[5] Nicolis, G., Prigogine, I. (1977) Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems. (Wiley, New York)
[6] Kauffman S (1993) The Origins of Order. (Oxford University Press, Oxford – New York)
[7] Patel A D (2008) Towards understanding the origin of genetic languages. Quantum Aspects of Life. eds. Abbot D, Davies P, Pati, A, (Imperial College Press, London), Ch. 10. arXiv: 0705.3895v2
[8] Crick F H C (1968) The origin of the genetic code. J. Mol. Biol. 38, 367–379.
[9] Pattee, H H (1971) Can life explain quantum mechanics? Quantum Theory and Beyond ed. Bastin T, (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge), pp. 307 – 319.
[10] Pattee, H H (1974) The vital statistics of quantum dynamics. Irreversible Thermodynamics and the Origin of Life. eds. Oster, G.F., Silver, I.L., Tobias, C.A., (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York), pp. 33 – 43.
[11] Bashford, J D, Tsohantjis, I, Jarvis, P D (1997) Codon and nucleotide assignments in a supersymmetric model of the genetic code. Phys. Lett. A. 233, 481–488.
[12] Bashford, J D, Tsohantjis, I, Jarvis, P D (1998) A supersymmetric model for the evolution of the genetic code. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 987–992.
[13] Darwin C R (1859) The Origin of Species. (Murray, London)
[14] Elze, H-T, Gambarotta, G., Vallone, F. (2011). Path integral for classical dynamics, entanglement, and Jaynes-Cummings model at the quantum-classical divide. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 9, 203–224.
[15] Dawkins R (1976) The Selfish Gene. (Freeman and Co., Oxford)
[16] Dyson F (1999) Origins of Life. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge)
[17] Matsuno K (1989) Protobiology: Physical Basis of Biology. (CRC Press, Boca Raton)
[18] Patel A D (2001). Quantum algorithms and the genetic code. Pramana – The J. of Phys. 56 (2- 3), 367 – 381.
[19] Pattee, H H (1973). Physical basis and origin of hierarchical control. Hierarchy Theory, ed. Pattee, H H, (Braziller, New York), Ch. 4.
[20] Zurek W H (2008) Relative states and the environment: einselection, envariance, quantum Darwinism and the existential interpretation. arXiv: 0707.2832v [quant-ph]
[21] Wigner E P (1961) On the probability of the existence of a self – reproducing unit. The Logic of Personal Knowledge: Essays Presented to Michael Polanyi (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London), pp. 231 – 238.
[22] Stapp H P (1993) Mind, Matter and Quantum Mechanics (Springer, Berlin – New York)
[23] Popa R (2004) Between Necessity and Probability: Searching for the Definition and Origin of Life (Springer Verlag , Berlin – Heidelberg)
[24] Bohr N (1934) Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature (Cambridge Univ. Press, London)
[25] Wigner, E. P., 1959. Group Theory and its Application for the Theory of Atomic Spectra, (Academic Press, New York)
[26] Conrad M. (1989) Physics and biology: Towards a unified model. Appl. Math. Comp. 32, 75 – 102.
[27] Conrad M. (1993) The fluctuon model of force, life and computation. Appl. Math. and Comp.56, 208 – 259.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    András Balázs. (2014). On the Origin and Invariance of the Genetic Assignments as Elementary Semiotic Controls: A Basic Hypothesis. European Journal of Biophysics, 2(3), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.20140203.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    András Balázs. On the Origin and Invariance of the Genetic Assignments as Elementary Semiotic Controls: A Basic Hypothesis. Eur. J. Biophys. 2014, 2(3), 17-28. doi: 10.11648/j.ejb.20140203.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    András Balázs. On the Origin and Invariance of the Genetic Assignments as Elementary Semiotic Controls: A Basic Hypothesis. Eur J Biophys. 2014;2(3):17-28. doi: 10.11648/j.ejb.20140203.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ejb.20140203.12,
      author = {András Balázs},
      title = {On the Origin and Invariance of the Genetic Assignments as Elementary Semiotic Controls: A Basic Hypothesis},
      journal = {European Journal of Biophysics},
      volume = {2},
      number = {3},
      pages = {17-28},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ejb.20140203.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.20140203.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ejb.20140203.12},
      abstract = {In this paper we hope to place the two basic facts of life, constant active self – maintenance and self – reproduction, into a fresh light. The basic idea is considering the genetic assignments as a „biological invariant of motion”, the latter forming a hierarchically produced, „self - constructing”, regressive time inversion symmetry restoration, a closed semantic real – time upbuilding loop. It is, actually, the predetermined future of the biological system. It is this, in fact, what gives birth to the above strange fact of determined self – maintenance and, as its derived consequence, „self” – reproduction, as the symmery attained. It is carried out in a mediated, „weak” self – reference loop, as a natural prerequisite for the invariance of the genetic code as a „biological invariant of motion”. Being an involved and dubious case, as it is usual, we mainly concentrate on its origin. We suppose a special type of quantum measurement as the original assignation mechanism, with a usual concomitant time inversion symmetry breaking. Symmetry restoring, in fact, is a semiotic control process of the genetic code, the process tentatively conceived to be the living (biological) state of matter.},
     year = {2014}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - On the Origin and Invariance of the Genetic Assignments as Elementary Semiotic Controls: A Basic Hypothesis
    AU  - András Balázs
    Y1  - 2014/08/10
    PY  - 2014
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.20140203.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ejb.20140203.12
    T2  - European Journal of Biophysics
    JF  - European Journal of Biophysics
    JO  - European Journal of Biophysics
    SP  - 17
    EP  - 28
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2329-1737
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.20140203.12
    AB  - In this paper we hope to place the two basic facts of life, constant active self – maintenance and self – reproduction, into a fresh light. The basic idea is considering the genetic assignments as a „biological invariant of motion”, the latter forming a hierarchically produced, „self - constructing”, regressive time inversion symmetry restoration, a closed semantic real – time upbuilding loop. It is, actually, the predetermined future of the biological system. It is this, in fact, what gives birth to the above strange fact of determined self – maintenance and, as its derived consequence, „self” – reproduction, as the symmery attained. It is carried out in a mediated, „weak” self – reference loop, as a natural prerequisite for the invariance of the genetic code as a „biological invariant of motion”. Being an involved and dubious case, as it is usual, we mainly concentrate on its origin. We suppose a special type of quantum measurement as the original assignation mechanism, with a usual concomitant time inversion symmetry breaking. Symmetry restoring, in fact, is a semiotic control process of the genetic code, the process tentatively conceived to be the living (biological) state of matter.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Biological Physics, ELTE TTK Budapest, H – 1117 Pázmány s. 1/A, HUNGARY

  • Sections